Colorectal

Cure in metastatic colorectal cancer

Programme details

Speaker

Discussion

Introduction

  • Liver metastasis is commonest form of metastasis in CRC
  • 35-55% of patients with colorectal cancer will develop hepatic metastasis
  • Only 30% will have metastases confined to the liver – potential candidates for resection
  • Untreated hepatic metastasis – dismal survival
  • Median survival 6 – 12 months
  • Median survival with chemotherapy: 12 – 24 months (deemed resectable retrospectively)

Types of liver metastasis

  • Synchronous
    • Diagnosed at the same time as the CRC or 3-6 months after resection
    • 20-30% of patients with CRC
  • Metachronous

Aiming at cure​

  • Surgical resection offers cure with 40% 5-year survival
  • Only few resectable
  • Tumour biology most important prognostic factor
  • Pushing forward the frontiers of resection
  • Personalized approach

Need of biopsy confirmation

  • Need depends of clinical picture
  • Needle tract seeding – very low incidence
  • Confirmatory imaging, rising markers, histopathology from primary– no need

Rationale of resection

  • 5-year survival following resection - 50-60%
  • Operative mortalitiy <1% (high volume centers)
  • 65% will have a recurrence at 5 years
  • Liver resection is the only treatment associated with long term survival

Work up and staging

  • Surveillance
  • Triple phase CECT
    • Hypovascular and hypodense in venous phase
  • MRI
    • Characterization of subtle and indeterminate lesions; steatotic liver; disappearing metastasis
  • PET – identification of extrahepatic disease
    • Recent RCT in metachronous lesions did not show significant difference in resectability or survival

Goals of preoperative imaging​

  • Identify the number and distribution of hepatic lesions
  • Proximity to major vascular (e.g., hepatic arteries, portal veins and inferior vena cava) as well as biliary structures
  • Idnetify extrahepatic disease
  • Calculate future liver remnant

Extrahepatic Disease​

  • Good survival in highly selected cases
  • Sites amenable: lung and ovarian metastases, locoregional recurrences of the primary tumor, portal lymph node, limited peritoneal disease
  • 5-yr survival for patients with concomitant EHD were 26% compared with 49% for those without (P < 0.001)
  • 95% ultimately recurred; median time to recurrence was 9 months

Prognostic indicators

  • Stage, nodal status of the primary CRC
  • Differentiation of the primary CRC
  • Disease-free interval from primary CRC to development of hepatic metastases
  • Number and distribution of the hepatic metastases
  • Preoperative CEA
  • Presence ofextrahepatic disease
  • Positive resection margin

Clinical Risk Score​

Preoperarive factors - 1 Point assigned for each

  • Node-positive primary
  • Disease-free interval from primary to metastases less than 12 months
  • More than one hepatic metastases
  • Largest hepatic metastases greater than 5 cm
  • CEA level greater than 200 ng/ml

Resectability

  • Ability to achieve R0 resection (including resectable extra hepatic disease)
  • Sufficient future liver remnant
  • Patient’s tolerance to major surgery
  • Resection for ≥ 4 metastases is no longer a contraindication
    • 5-year survival rate of 23-51%
    • High recurrence rates

Future Liver Remnant​

  • Normal liver: 20-30% of total liver volume​

  • Steatosis or steatohepatitis: 30-40%
  • Cirrhosis: 40-50%

Strategies to increase FLR

  • Parenchyma sparing and segmental resections
  • Portal vein embolization
  • Two stage resections
  • Combination of liver directed therapies
    • Surgery, ablation, SBRT
  • ALPPS

Portal Vein Embolization (PVE)

  • 20% of patients requiring hepatectomy have adequate FLR
  • Insufficient remnant liver volume is the main cause
  • PVE by increasing FLR helps in improving surgical candidacy
  • Healthy liver regenerates at rates of 12-21 cm3/d at 2 weeks, 11cm3/d at 4 weeks, and 6 cm3/d at 32 days after PVE
  • Cirrhotic livers, in contrast, regenerate at a rate of 9 cm3/d at 2 weeks

Resection strategies

  • Simultaneous
  • Sequential bowel first
  • Sequential liver first

Review of scientific evidence

  • Non randomized studies
  • Important selection bias
  • Sequential in patients with greater liver disease
  • No clear evidence

Sequential liver first

  • Asymptomatic primary
  • Unresectable or borderline resectable liver lesion
  • Doubtful resectable extrahepatic disease
  • Liver lesions at risk of becoming unresectable if they progress after resection of primary
  • Complex surgery of the CRC and liver lesion

Sequential colon first

  • Complicated primary

Simultaneous surgery

  • Good general condition patient who can withstand both procedure​

  • High probability of R0 in both fields
  • Sufficient liver remnant
  • No extrahepatic disease
  • Uncomplicated primary
  • Do not associate complex surgeries in the two fields

Extensive bilobar metastases / Unresectable metastasis

  • Inadequate FLR
  • MRI more sensitive than CT for sub-centimetre lesions, reassessment after NACT and in fatty liver
  • Conversion therapy - potentially curative resection
  • Combination of liver directed therapies
    • Surgery, ablation, radiation
    • Staged surgery

Surgical Margins

  • Positive margins are associated with higher risk of recurrence and decreased overall survival
  • Classically 1 cm margin is sought
  • Negative margins irrespective of width is associated with favourable long term survival
  • R1 resection had a median survival of 24 months compared with 46 months for patients who underwent an R0 resection

Conversion chemotherapy

  • Initially unresectable disease
  • 10-60% of such patients have a sufficient objective response to permit R0 resection
  • HAI chemotherapy has shown promising results
  • Resected patients have outcomes similar to those of patients who were initially resectable disease
  • Five-year survival rates average 30 to 35 percent

Effect of chemotherapy​

  • Shrinking margin
    • Margin that is produced by shrinkage of metastasis is likely tumor free
  • Disappearing lesion
    • Complete response rate; 4 – 9%​

    • Residual microscopic disease in 80%​

    • Hinders identification and resection​

    • Optimal to remove all the liver that ever contained tumor​

  • Goal is not to treat to 'maximal' effect, but rather for a defined time course (neoadjuvant) or until the disease is resectable (conversion therapy)

Liver Toxicity

  • Oxaliplatin: hepatic sinusoidal obstruction
  • Irinotecan: steatosis / steatohepatitis
  • Higher perioperative infectious complications and 90-day mortality has been reported
  • >12 weeks of chemotherapy, or resection ≤ 4 weeks after stopping chemotherapy - more complications, higher reoperation rates and longer hospital stay

Combined Local Therapy

  • Complimentary approach
  • Extensive disease: larger lesions can be resected, while smaller ones can be ablated
  • Combining hepatic resection with ablative techniques is well-tolerated with perioperative complications (< 10%) and mortality comparable to resection alone

Repeat hepatectomy

  • About two thirds of cases recur
  • ∼5% of these are candidates for a second liver resection
  • Operative mortality and postoperative morbidity similar tothat of first hepatectomy
  • 5-year survival of 44%

Peritoneal metastasis

  • In selected patients with peritoneal metastasis, complete cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC may provide prolonged survival when carried out in experienced high-volume centres
  • Depends on the extent of peritoneal dissemination and is scored using the peritoneal cancer index (PCI), which is the main prognostic factor
  • Particularly effective in patients with low-volume peritoneal disease (a PCI <12 is often suggested) and no evidence of systemic disease

About Speaker

Dr. Nikhil Agrawal
MS, MCh

This site helps you understand the disease process, best treatment options and outcome of gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary and pancreatic diseases and cancers. Dr. Nikhil Agrawal is Director of GI-HPB Surgery and Oncology at Max Superspeciality Hospital Saket, New Delhi and Max Hospital, Gurugram in India.